| |
| |
| Source
- www.morarkango.com |
New Page 37
Physical, Chemical & Biological
Specifications
Physical
- Vermicast is a dark brown/black humus like coarse material, soft in feel
and free from any foul smell, live weed seeds and other contaminations.
- Mucus type substance coated on each particle that increases aeration in
the soil, provides excellent water retention properties and improves the
drainage in heavy soils.
- Contains sufficient moisture (25-35%) at the time of packing.
Chemical
|
·
pH
|
6.5-7.5
|
|
·
Organic Carbon %
|
20.43 – 30.31
|
|
·
Nitrogen %
|
1.80 – 2.05
|
|
·
Phosphorus %
|
1.32 – 1.93
|
|
·
Potassium %
|
1.28 – 1.50
|
|
·
Carbon : Nitrogen
|
14-15 : 1
|
|
·
Calcium %
|
3.0 – 4.5
|
|
·
Magnesium %
|
0.4 – 0.7
|
|
·
Sodium %
|
0.02 – 0.30
|
|
·
Sulphur
%
|
Traces to 0.40
|
|
·
Iron %
|
0.3 – 0.7
|
|
·
Zinc %
|
0.028 – 0.036
|
|
·
Manganese %
|
Traces to 0.40
|
|
·
Copper %
|
0.0027 – 0.0123
|
|
·
Boron %
|
0.0034 – 0.0075
|
|
·
Aluminium %
|
Traces to 0.071
|
|
·
Cobalt, Molybdenum
|
Present in available form
|
Biological
Total bacter count of 2.5 ´ 106 comprising of Azotobacter, PGPR, PSB,
Actinomycetes. Also contains Gibberalline, Auxins & Cyctokinine in
sufficient quantities.
Vermicast vs. Chemical Fertilizers in Soil
|
Criteria
for Comparison
|
Chemical
Fertilizers
|
Vermicast
|
|
Macro
nutrient contents
|
Mostly contains
only one (N in urea) or at the most two (N & P in DAP) nutrients in
any one type of chemical fertilizer
|
Contains all
i.e. nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) & potassium (K) in sufficient
quantities
|
|
Secondary
nutrient contents
|
Not available
|
Calcium (Ca),
magnesium (Mg) & sulphur (S) is available in required quantities
|
|
Micro
nutrient contents
|
Not available
|
Zinc (Zn),
boron (B), manganese (Mn), iron (Fe), copper
(Cu), molybdenum (Mo) and chlorine (Cl) also
present
|
|
pH
balancing
|
Disturb soil pH
to create salinity and alkalinity conditions
|
Helps in the
control of soil pH and checks the salinity and alkalinity in soil
|
|
EC
correction
|
Creates
imbalance in soil EC affecting nutrients assimilation
|
Helps in
balancing the EC to improve plant nutrient adsorption
|
|
Organic
carbon
|
Not available
|
Very high
organic carbon and humus contents improves soil characteristics
|
|
Moisture
retention capacity
|
Reduces
moisture retention capacity of the soil
|
Increases
moistures retention capacity of the soil
|
|
Soil
Texture
|
Damages soil
texture to reduce aeration
|
Improves soil
texture for better aeration
|
|
Beneficial
bacteria & fungi
|
Reduces
biological activities and thus the fertility is impaired
|
Very high
biological life improves the soil fertility and productivity on
sustainable basis
|
|
Plant
growth hormones
|
Not available
|
Sufficient
quantity helps in better growth and production
|
Economic Evaluation: Vermicast vs. Chemical
Fertilizers
Generally cost comparisons for different fertility inputs are carried out on
per unit of cultivated area basis. However, the correct methods for comparison
should be either the cost per unit of output or the cost per unit of fertility
inputs. Here a comparison has been made on the basis of cost per unit of
fertility inputs provided through chemical fertilizers Vs. vermicast.
Cost of Chemical Fertilizer Use
Presently chemical fertilizers are used for providing nutrients such as
nitrogen, phosphorous and potash. The cost of these chemical fertilizers in
the context of their plant uptake i.e. fertilizers use efficiency are
estimated as follows.
Urea
- Say 100 kg of urea is used per hectare, containing 46% nitrogen.
- Cost of urea is Rs.4.50/- per kg and thus cost of nitrogen is Rs.9.80/-
per kg.
- Plant uptake i.e. use efficiency is 15-40 percent (average 20%) for
nitrogen.
- Therefore, the cost of nitrogen actually used by the plants is Rs.49.00
per kg.
DAP
- Say 100 kg of DAP is used per hectare.
- This contains 18 percent nitrogen and 46 percent phosphorus.
- Cost of DAP is Rs.8.50/- per kg and thus the cost of nutrients (combined
for nitrogen plus phosphorus) is Rs.13.30/- per kg.
- Plant uptake i,.e. use efficiency is 15-40 percent for nitrogen (average
20%) and 10-25 percent for phosphorus (average 15%).
- The cost of nutrients actually used by the plants from DAP is Rs.75.94/-
per kg.
SSP
- Say 100 kg of SSP is used per hectare, containing 16% phosphorus.
- Cost of SSP is Rs.2.60/- per kg and thus cost of phosphorus is Rs.16.25/-
per kg.
- Plant uptake i.e. use efficiency is 10-25 percent for phosphorus (average
15%).
- The cost of phosphorus actually used by the plants is Rs.108.82/- per kg.
CAN
- Say 100 kg of CAN is used per hectare, containing 20% nitrogen.
- Cost of CAN is Rs.4.20/- per kg and thus the cost of nitrogen is
Rs.21.00/- per kg.
- Plant uptake i.e. use efficiency is 15-40 percent (average 20%).
- The cost of nitrogen actually used by the plants is Rs.1005.00/- per kg.
Cost of Vermicast Use
In case of vermicast, over 70 percent is consumed by the farmers through their
in-house production. For remaining, the farmers are buying vermicast from
commercial production units at an average price of Rs.2000/- per metric tone.
- The average nutrients contents reported for vermicast are nitrogen-1.5 to
2.5 percent (average 2%), phosphorus-1.25 percent (average 1.75%),
potash-1.00 to 2.00 percent (average 1.5%).
- In addition vermicast contains all micronutrients and trace elements, that
would also add up to atleast one percent equivalent of nutrients.
- The vermicast has active biological life containing Azatobactor, PSB,
PGPR, etc. During 90-100 days of crop duration they also add up to 1.5 to
2.5 percent nutrients (average 2%).
- Say 1000 kg of vermicast is used per hectare.
- The total nutrients provided by 1000 kg of vermicast will add up to 82.50
per kg (8.25%) and at an average plant uptake i.e. use efficiency of 65
percent will provide 53.60 kgs of nutrients.
- At an average cost of vermicast at Rs.2000/- per MT per hectare, the cost
of nutrients is Rs.37.00/- per kg.
In addition to nutrients, vermicast will also provide better aeration, water
retention capacity and many other benefits. Some of the major advantages of
vermicast use are also the lower cost of labour (saving due to less weeds in
the field) and saving from the cost of treatment for termites.
Vermicast on subsequent use has been found to provide at least 20-30 percent
more nutrients. This ability can continuously reduce the quantities of
vermicast used in the field over long durations.
From the above the actual nutrient used and the cost incurred for various
chemical fertilizers, it clearly indicates that the chemical fertilizers are
more expensive than vermicast.
The use of chemicals has also been promoted by large amounts of subsidies that
enabled them to be used as nutrients for crops.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|